Why the market for second hand hybrids is a buyer’s market

I recently purchased a Honda CR-Z over Trade Me via a private sale. This machine is amazing – it goes 887 kilometres off a $67 tank of gas, adding a full 220 kilometres to my past, still-relatively-fuel-efficient, vehicle.
The machine is in near perfect condition and looks set to last many years. It saves me nearly $20 a week in gas and with petrol inflation factored in, looks set to generate  return on investment of over 13%, paying for itself over 7.5 years. Best of all, it cost me only $8,500 when the market value is over $11,500.

How did I get such a machine at a 26% discount? By knowing the market, watching the models I was interested in, negotiating hard (but fair). Essentially, by being the only one looking.

Every week, new hybrid models are coming up online, often trading at a discount to what they’re worth. After a model has been on the market for a few weeks it’s ready to move, often at a discount price. Keeping an eye on the market is often a worthwhile thing.

Understanding how solar works conceptually, so you can explain it better

Solar power has changed our household. It was not necessarily the wisest investment, and had I known all that there was to know before I installed it I probably wouldn’t have installed it. But even so, it has completely changed how we understand and use power within our own household, and in addition to the power the panels have provided, it has led us to reconsider our use on many appliances to make more efficient use of the power supplied.

Solar power does not generate a consistent amount of power every day. The worst days will be when it is rainy or overcast the whole day through. On these days, even our 1.5 kWh system might only generate 1 kWh of total power – barely saving us 25 cents.

On brighter days, it may generate ten times this amount. The problem is, during the brightest of days, we have very little need of daytime energy.
We are with an energy provider who offers us a very good rate overall, but who does not allow us to sell surplus energy back to the grid. This means we must find creative ways to use the surplus. One of the best ways I’ve found of using up surplus solar energy is to make evening meals using a slow cooker that you leave running during the daytime. This can easily consume 1.8 kWh of your surplus, and take that energy off the grid for the requirement of cooking an evening meal – a process that is far more efficient, as evening meals regularly use 2 to 3 kWh to cook during peak hours when solar supply is not available.

So to make better use of solar, you need to make sure that you have not only the supply, but also the household demand. Planning your solar use effectively is like a game that can literally save your household thousands of dollars over a few years.

I would not recommend solar for just any household. One of the first things you must do is assess your own household consumption. There is no real automated way to do this, so it requires a lot of planning and recording. You cannot glean these sorts of insights from your energy bill.

That means standing at your smart meter and recording power consumption levels on the hour, day after day if need be, and across multiple seasons if you want a really accurate forecast. Getting a real time picture of how much energy you use during daylight hours will improve the viability of your solar installation. Half of solar is in the planning.

This is an important step. One of the worst mistakes you can make environmentally is to buy more than you need.

Were an app or piece of software available that could parse your power consumption data and do the maths for you, this would greatly improve the efficiency of solar power installations worldwide. An upfront understanding of how and when your household actually uses power is critical to planning.

Solar is something that can be optimised through planning.

Sculpting home energy use to suit solar panels, or sculpting solar panel use to suit home energy needs?

One thing I just keep going back to is the optimal usage of solar panels, once installed, and the question this raises about how far one should tailor one’s energy consumption to suit the renewable energy that is now available.

The usage of solar panels is almost a question or architecture and urban planning. Knowing that one will receive a certain amount of (somewhat) predictable renewable energy supply means that one can plan obsessively over how to get a bit more squeeze out of the lemon, so to speak.

Solar panels are a very poorly understood asset. Their value is all too often overstated, and yet there are many opportunities for their deployment where they would deliver exceptional returns.

The question for me is, do I allow solar panels to dictate my usage of energy, particularly in summer when we have an abundance of it, or do I instead prioritise the (sometimes whimsical) use of energy in my household, and just use the panels as a mop to catch the consumption?

A better understanding of solar panels could potentially save me thousands. Yet I struggle sometimes in summer to come up with ways to use the power. 

I also struggle to adjust my habits quite as far as I should. I know I could make better use of my slow cooker, for instance. But with spare time across the holidays it’s actually more fun to chuck something on the frying pan.
This year I’m going to learn at least 15 new recipes. At least 10 of them will be slow cooker recipes. I could perhaps go so far as to invite a few more people over for a feed.

I also want to concentrate a bit more on legumes as a source of nutrition, and find ways to make better use of the stock I make.
It’s a fun little exercise, and cents are on the line.

Comparison 2 weeks – Gross kWh consumption – HRV installation

Two weeks ago we installed an HRV system in the administration block at the motel manager flat. Based on the data we’ve collected since then, I have put together a comparison of the pre- and post-installation kWh consumption data to arrive at a (very rough) indication of return on investment for an HRV system.
<!–more–>
Post installation daily data (total kWH consumption)
Pre-installation daily data (total kWh consumption)
25.3
9.28
22.8
17.8
18.3
22.2
12.5
22.6
14.7
29.7
10.7
21.3
14.9
15.3
22.2
26.8
15.6
22.1
11.1
19
18.3
17.8
8.22
22.3
10.6
17.7
12.2
22.3
217.42
286.18
15.53
20.44
Now, obviously there are some assumptions. A motel business is always moving and changing, so no two sets of data collected from two different timeframes will be directly comparable. In this instance, I have compared the data from the two weeks before we installed the HRV system with the data from the two weeks directly after we installed the HRV system. The reasons this may not be sufficient data to give a realistic return on investment calculation are as follows:
a) The data set is very small, spanning only 4 weeks of total daily kWh consumption at our property
b) The data was collected from two different seasonal periods. We are currently at the very start of spring, days are growing longer and temperatures are getting gradually better. Therefore some of the daily kWh consumption savings may be attributable to changes in daily temperatures and light hours, rather than to the system itself
c) The period between the end of winter and the start of spring may be the period when the HRV system delivers its best savings. The reason for this is that there is now enough heat to heat the roof space to a higher temperature than the living space, whereas at other times of the year the difference between these two temperatures may not be that significant.
There are also reasons why this data would not be indicative of other households. It is a reflection of the consumption saving in our motel administration block only, because of the following:
a) Our administration block is a certain size, and the system may function differently based on the building design.
b) Having a system that circulates warm air from cavities in the roof into colder parts of the living area is all well and good, but unless that system encourages the people who occupy that space to make actual changes to the way they use electricity for heating, then there won’t be as pronounced a difference in the before and after data. (ie if you install an HRV system but then continue to run your electric heaters regardless, you won’t save any energy at all.)
c) The system itself has different settings, each of which use different levels of power and produce different results, which I have only begun to play around with.
d) We have already undertaken energy saving initiatives to reduce the heating bill. These will be unique to our motel administration block.
For all of those above reasons, the data I am reproducing here is indicative only and ought not to be considered a benchmark for other households installing an HRV system.
Based on the data above and the assumptions noted, I have drawn the following table of conclusions:
Average kWh Saving (Daily)
4.911
Current value in $ (ex GST)
$1.19
Current value in $ (inc GST)
$1.37
Gross annual saving (inc GST)
$500.96
Maintenance Cost (annual)
$115.00
Assumed net saving (inc GST)
$385.96
Return on Investment
11.35%
Note that I am applying our current kWh cost of $0.243 + GST per kWh, which we receive from Nova Energy.
The above table gives an indication of simple ROI, but does not allow for inflation. One of the main benefits of an HRV system is that if it functions well, it can reduce the number of kWh actually required to heat a home. This has a counter-inflationary effect, because the price per kWh tends to go up over time. I have it that based on the past 40 years of NZ retail electricity data, the price per kWh has gone up an average of 3.2% per annum. Extrapolating this out to the next 20 years, we can produce a more complex picture of return on investment over time.
Year
Cost per kWh inc GST
Net return from HRV system per year
Annual ROI from HRV system (%)
2018
$0.28
$385.92
11.35%
2019
$0.29
$401.95
11.82%
2020
$0.30
$418.49
12.31%
2021
$0.31
$435.56
12.81%
2022
$0.32
$453.18
13.33%
2023
$0.33
$471.36
13.86%
2024
$0.34
$490.13
14.42%
2025
$0.35
$509.49
14.98%
2026
$0.36
$529.47
15.57%
2027
$0.37
$550.10
16.18%
2028
$0.38
$571.38
16.81%
2029
$0.40
$593.34
17.45%
2030
$0.41
$616.01
18.12%
2031
$0.42
$639.40
18.81%
2032
$0.43
$663.54
19.52%
2033
$0.45
$688.46
20.25%
2034
$0.46
$714.17
21.00%
2035
$0.48
$740.70
21.79%
2035
$0.49
$768.08
22.59%
2035
$0.51
$796.34
23.42%
2035
$0.52
$825.50
24.28%
Sum of cashflows
$12,262.57
17.17%
Note in conclusion that this data is all very early, may have been collected at an optimal time of year for the system, and if later stages of the year show lower returns, it would distort the figures above significantly. However, despite one or two things, which I’ll cover in later articles, I am overall fairly pleased with the investment.

Generate Kiwisaver versus Simplicity Kiwisaver

Following on from my decision to invest an additional $2 per week into Kiwisaver, I went through a process of assessing my long term goals, reviewing the available funds and their investment philosophies, and arriving at the decision that the best long term investment option that met my investment criteria was the Simplicity Kiwisaver Balanced Fund.

Continue reading “Generate Kiwisaver versus Simplicity Kiwisaver”

How food co-ops are changing habits around plastic bag use

Given the ‘plastic bag revolution’, one interesting side effect that I’ve noticed around belonging to an organic food co-op is that the process of belonging to the co-op seems automatically to reduce the quantity of plastic bags that I and other co-op members consume on a weekly basis.

Continue reading “How food co-ops are changing habits around plastic bag use”